Amen. Actions and Consequences

Costa-Gavras Amen. is a estimation-provoking film that combines political thriller, uncertainty and expose. Amen, translated in Hebrew as So be it, deals with three significant events, both(prenominal) real and fictitious, who act out una similar moral or respectable principles. These characters, forefather Riccardo Fontana, Kurt Gerstein and pontiff Pius xii, pop the question the audience with opposite perspectives on the dilemma round the racial extermination of millions of Jews during World War II, comm totally cognise as the Holocaust.By reflecting on the lives, actions or personalities of these three characters, we would understand the ethical challenges, ethical principles and actions they vex faced, considered and performed. Body sky pilot Riccardo Fontana, compete by Mathleu Kassovitz, is a junior diplomatist and an idealistic Jesuit priest. get Riccardo Fontana wise(p) the spiritedness and sufferings of the Jews in the national socialist tautness camps (through the help of Kurt Gerstein). He as well as intimate that the American government inquired about the race murder of Jews through a letter communicate at the Vatican.He endeavoured or tried his trump to alert the Vatican about the racial extermination of Jews in the Nazi concentration camps. He thought that his familial connections with the local priests and at the Vatican would influence in results or considerations from the Pope. He in any case thought that by directly stating the conundrums at the Nazi concentration camps to the Pope, he would be able to lick light to the problem and have the Pope do his agency by making a in the public eye(predicate) argument condemning the actions of the Nazis.However, in the end, he was not able to have the backup man of the Vatican. He lost his life induce Riccardo Fontana died a martyr. get Riccardo Fontana is a fictional character in the moving picture however, I call up that he symbolizes the early life of Pope Pius xii. As a virtuously reclaimeous priest, I weigh that he wanted to ease the botheration or sufferings of the Jews. As a diplomat, I believe that he wanted to do things in a peaceful and legal manner. I in addition think Father Riccardo Fontana believes on deontological morals.Deontological ethics or deontology refers to the method of applying ethics by focusing on what actions atomic enactment 18 right or unconventional, regardless whether the consequences would right or not. This ethical principle is some prison terms referred to as obligation or business ethics. These atomic number 18 the reasons why I believe, Father Riccardo Fontana tried his best to alert the Pope, defend a difference or bring the Jews help from the Vatican even if it means to sacrificing his ingest life for the sake of avocation. If I were Father Riccardo Fontana, I would also inform or alert the Vatican, particularly the Pope.I would tick offk his assistant regarding the genocide of Jews and strongly emphasize my question that it is wrong and immoral. I would let them see that as priests, we should do our best to relate life and peace all throughout the world, despite the differences in race or ethnicity. I would stand for the right of my gallant Jews, especially for their right to live. However, unlike Father Riccardo Fontana, I would seek or exit other kinds of help if all of the forward acts fail. I help the Jews by concealing them from the Nazis and I lead ease their pain with my prayers.Subsequently, I allow continue my efforts to take aim the authorities do their part. I will not have myself killed, not for egotistic reasons, but because I know that decease wont solve anything. If I die, I would no longer be able to help the Jews or the compulsiony. If I die, I wont be able to strengthen their morale and economise their spirits and hopes high. On the other hand, Kurt Gerstein, compete by Ulrich Tukur, is a real character or individual, greatly devote d to his duty as a soldier and sacred intuitive feelings as a Protestant. He is a German SS officer on card the Waffen-SS during the World War II.He is also an smart as a whip scientist and member of the Institute for Hygiene who real the gas Zyklon B for treating or curing the waters drank and used by Nazi soldiers. As a scientist, hygienist and developer of the Zyklon B, he only wanted to prevent illnesses or the diffuse of diseases among the Nazi troops. Unfortunately, Zyklon B was used to repeal the Jews. Raised in a family of nationalistic officers and soldiers with strong smell of responsibility, his obedience or compliance to authority cannot be doubted. However, subsequent on learning this horrible the true, his values as a Protestant dominated his sense of patriotism.He alerted the Protestant leaders, then the authorities, Swedish diplomats and also the papist Catholic Church about the immoral acts committed by his superiors. He took actions similar to what Fa ther Riccardo Fontana did and just like the efforts of Father Riccardo Fontana, Gersteins efforts were in awe. Conversely, I am convinced that he believes the akin ethical principles as Father Ricardo Fontana. If I were Kurt Gerstein, I would first try to go on a higher position in the Nazi party. I will do my best to reach that position as soon as possible because time is of the essence.After having power or authority, I would promptly see to it that the officers under my authority would leave help to the Jews. I would do this in secret or back tooth the radar of my superiors so that I can still have my power and my life for the service of those who be suffering. With my power and my life, I will provide more help or withstand more things morally right. Pope Pius cardinal, the or so controversial character in the movie, is subjected to allegations of preserving his selfish-needs, economical interests, ambition and power by doing zipper regardless of knowing the horrible truth at the Nazi concentration camps.In this sense, allegedly, the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church in extension, committed passive sin. Somehow, watching the movie had made me scrutinize or inspect on the faith and hope that I had for the Vatican or to the Pope. Putting myself in the raiment of Kurt Gerstein and Father Riccardo Fontana made me doubt that the apparitional authorities are not morally upright. However, considering the position of the Pope, I reclaimed my belief that he did not do anything wrong and that he only wanted greater good for a greater number of individuals or Jews in particular.As a expectant and religious leader, every action should be seriously weighed and the interests of those who are in need or prosecuted should be considered in regulate to prevent further harm through with(p) to them. Alerting the international public would break the allegiance of the Vatican and the Nazi party and turn on more tension. If the allegiance is lost and the Naz is are angered by the public description or expose of their immoral acts, will the Vatican be able to address the vengeance of the Nazis? How can the Vatican keep Jews, provide provender and shelter in chapels if the angered Nazis destroyed the Catholic chapels?Will the public statement improve the situation of the prosecuted Jews? Will it sojourn a possible war? I dont think. This is due to the item that the Nazi party has great armed forces power at that time to retaliate to any threat or opposition. existence protests against this inhumane party would only improver prosecution, not only of Jews but also Roman Catholics and that would be further agonizing. I think that as a religious leader, a morally upright Roman Catholic and diplomat, Pope Pius XII did actions behind the eye of the public to help the Jews.I believe that Pope Pius XII believes in utilitarianism and because of this. Consequently, he suffered the pain of doing nothing because he knew that the consequence s would be right or provide greater good. Conclusion Father Riccardo Fontana, Kurt Gerstein and Pope Pius XII are three interesting characters with vary perspectives when it comes to what is right or wrong. Father Riccardo Fontana and Kurt Gerstein believed in fulfilling their moral obligations while Pope Pius XII believed that the end justifies the means.The first deuce characters believed in doing things now and in considering consequences later while the third character was thought of the consequences first before making an action. Somehow, I believe that the Holocaust or the genocide of millions of Jews in Nazi concentration camps, considering these cardinal opposite ethical principles, is a dilemma. It is a dilemma where I believe, Pope Pius XII did the best choice. Works Cited Costa-Gavras, dir. Amen. Perfs. Ulrich Tukur, Mathieu Kassovitz. Kino International, 2002.